This law amends the previously established by this Tribunal where income was considered comparable to that obtained by the resulting work to rescue a pension scheme. The House has remarked that in reality the Plan rescue the person does not increase its assets, but an asset is replaced by another - the money earned. It would be relevant only as income gain, gain or performance could be obtained with the Plan.

OCU believes that the Treasury should also follow this approach for tax purposes so that neither was regarded as earned income rescuing Pension Plans. OCU asks that taxation is changed at the time of collection so that only tax is paid by the eventual profit or gain - in fact, may have losses-and not pay tax on the entire amount charged as now, and also the type marginal as labor income, which in reality can be much higher than income from savings. 

OCU believes that the taxation of pension schemes is not as favorable as it should be if you want to encourage saving for retirement. In fact, in most cases more taxes paid to rescue those who are saved by the contributions and also their final return (with some exceptions) leaves much to be desired. 

Therefore OCU believes that face-to encourage alternative methods of retirement via savings and private efforts should be fiscally equally to all savings instruments, so that there is fiscal neutrality and not be encouraged only a few products against others who also can be harmful to consumers.