Desde OCU deseamos informarte que nuestra página web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros para medir y analizar la navegación de nuestros usuarios con el fin de poder ofrecerte productos y servicios de tu interés. Mediante el uso de nuestro sitio web aceptas esta Política y consientes el uso de cookies. Puedes cambiar la configuración u obtener más información consultando aquí.

Precios

OCU Analysis on 17 BB creams

29 sep. 2014

Many promises but few results  

Madrid, 29 September. OCU has analyzed 17 creams, 13 BB Creams and 4 CC Creams, which were acquired in different premises (pharmacies, parapharmacies, perfumeries and supermarkets). These creams combine hydration with makeup. This fact and an outstanding marketing campaign have made them very popular in the women's cosmetics market. However OCU believes that, despite their advertising, the results are not as bright.

The analysis performed by OCU has taken into account different aspects. First hydration was measured with a laboratory test in a group of volunteers. It has also been tested in the laboratory if they meet the sun protection factor (SPF) advertised on their labeling, and if they offer protection against UVA rays. Finally, we have taken into account the assessment of volunteers about the cosmetic properties (texture, perfume, skin application, if they leave greasy or sticky touch,  absorption speed…) and about the perceived effectiveness (skin tone homogenization, natural finish, moisturized feeling, imperfections covering...)

To complete the study we have analyzed the labeling and we have valued the ingredients stated.

Three out of the 17 products analyzed contained preservatives (parabens: butylparaben and propylparaben), which, despite being authorized, OCU considers unsuitable for this type of products which have a prolonged contact with skin.

Parabens are a family of substances widely used in cosmetics for preservative activity, there are plenty of them. Some have been proven safe, others have been questioned, and others are no longer allowed in the EU.

Although such creams include a sun protection factor in their composition and labeling, this is not always true. In 4 products sun protection index is less than the index shown on the label, in some cases even up to 50% less. Regarding UVA protection, many creams do not give a good protection against these rays cause of skin aging. With respect their moisturizing ability, some creams results are a surprise because of their poor performance, especially since this parameter is considered a basic one in a skin care product.

OCU warns again about price differences among brands. Perfumery brands are a 55% more expensive than those sold in supermarkets and a 35% more expensive than those distributed in pharmacies. However, OCU emphasizes that there are quality products in all sales channels.

Diadermine, La Roche Posay and NIVEA Q10 are the top three brands, with NiveaQ10 at the top of the analysis and standing out for its good price.

For more information (media) Eva Jimenez Tel. 917226061 prensa@ocu.org